I am currently writing a paper for Systematic III on the eternal destiny of those who have not heard of Christ or his gospel. I went into research with prior convictions, and have had those convictions strengthened and amplified. How Christians view the eternal destiny of those who have not heard of Jesus will make or break world missions.
I will post the paper when it’s done (which will be added to over the Christmas break…Lord willing), but consider this the brief version.
In a broad sense, there are three competing beliefs:
1) Universalism – This is the view that all will be saved, because all religions/belief systems are small parts of one universal faith. Eventually we’ll all end up in the same place.
2) Evangelical Inclusivism – This is the view that salvation was purchased by Christ on the cross; however, conscious faith in Christ is not necessary. Thus, through natural revelation, and within other religious schemes, people can be saved by the little knowledge they do have of God.
3) Exclusivism – This is the view that salvation is in Christ alone, by conscious faith in Christ alone.
You will not find Christian universalists. Anyone who does not see Christ’s work on the cross and his resurrection as necessary to salvation cannot be saved.
You will, however, find Christians who hold to evangelical inclusivism. They claim to see possibilities of it in Scripture, and believe that it’s going “beyond what is written” to firmly state that the unreached will suffer condemnation.
Yet, Scripture appears to clearly teach that salvation is found only in Christ, by conscious faith in Christ. In fact, Jesus himself used highly exclusive language as he claimed to be “the way, the truth, and the life” or “the gate” by which the sheep enter the fold. He plainly says, “Whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.” This would include those who have not yet heard the gospel. The apostle Paul (an established missionary wouldn’t you say?) clearly understood this:
“For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. But how are they to call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent?” -Rom. 10:13-15
As for missionary efforts: They would cease to exist if the first two views were true. In the rubric of universalism, there is absolutely no need to reach the unreached; everyone is already going to be saved. With inclusivism, the Christian is left with no urgency to reach anyone with the gospel. In fact, I believe he/she is led to do the opposite. If a person will surely be condemned for rejecting the gospel, yet might be saved if they don’t ever hear the gospel…then we should all do our very best to keep our mouth shut! After all, who wants to be responsible for bringing the gospel to someone who rejects it when they might have been saved apart from hearing it?
There is only one position that is faithful to Scripture: Conscious faith in Jesus Christ alone saves the unworthy sinner, and sets him apart for living presently and eternally in Christ.
(P.S. – A great book plug to go with this topic: Let the Nations be Glad by John Piper. It greatly aided how I think of missions. And I’m currently enjoying a book called The Centrality of Christ in Contemporary Missions, edited by Mike Barnett and Michael Pocock. I’m not so sure it’s available everywhere, so here’s a link to it. I am yet to finish it, but it’s been great so far. If I come across anything terrible in the next few chapters I’ll make sure and update this book plug.)